Skip to main content

Cell wall remodeling promotes callus formation in poplar

In plant tissue culture, callus, a group of pluripotent cells, can be induced from detached explants by phytohormones on callus-inducing medium (CIM), and then callus can differentiate into root or shoot tissues, respectively (Xu et al. 2019; Zhai et al. 2024). Therefore, callus formation is thought to reflect a change in cell fate whereby differentiated somatic cells reacquire pluripotency (Xu et al. 2019). Various studies have uncovered the molecular mechanisms underlying changes in cell fate during callus formation (Zhai and Xu 2021). In addition to changes in gene expression, cell wall changes are also involved in regulating plant regeneration (Xu et al. 2019). For instance, cell wall damage activates four transcription factor genes from the DOF (DNA binding with one finger) family that promote tissue regeneration (Zhang et al. 2022). Recent research has also shown that the expression of cell-wall-loosening enzymes in the shell of cells surrounding the progenitor can activate cell polarity in progenitors to promote shoot regeneration from an undifferentiated callus (Varapparambath et al. 2022). However, the mechanisms underlying how the cell wall participates in callus formation remain unclear, especially in woody plants.

To investigate the molecular basis of differentiated cells reacquiring pluripotency during callus formation, we performed the whole transcriptome analysis of 84 K poplar (Populus alba x P. tremula var. glandulosa) during the three stages of callus formation (Fig. 1A). We identified 28,984 messenger RNAs (mRNAs), 1,719 long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), 1171 novel circular RNAs (circRNAs), and 540 microRNAs (miRNAs) (Supplementary Table S1). To further explore gene expression patterns during callus formation, we identified differentially expressed (DE) mRNA and ncRNA at the three stages using the criteria |Log2(foldchange) |> 1 and p < 0.05 through pairwise comparisons (Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Fig. 1A). The expression profiles of DE RNAs at the three time points were plotted using a clustering heatmap (Fig. 1B, Supplementary Fig. 1B). The key genes involved in cell fate modulation, such as WOX5, WOX11, PLT1, and LBD16, were upregulated in stage S2 compared to S1 (Supplementary Table S3). The results were consistent with previous reports (Xu et al. 2019), indicating their crucial role in altering cell fate during callus induction. During the phase from S2 to S3, the expressions of reprogramming-related genes did not significantly change, and the genes that maintained the identity of callus cells and promoted cell division, such as LBD16, LBD29 and WOX11 (Liu et al. 2018), were highly expressed. As a result, we categorized pluripotency acquisition into two distinct phases: cell fate transition (S1 vs. S2) and proliferation (S2 vs. S3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Plant material used for whole transcriptome sequencing. Scale bars, 1 cm. B Heatmap showing the transcript levels of differentially expressed genes. Transcript levels (average FPKM) were Log10-normalized. Purple, upregulation; orange, downregulation. C Cell wall-related GO term enrichment of differentially expressed mRNAs in cell fate transition and proliferation. The size of the circle indicates the number of genes and the color indicates the p-value. D Heatmap showing the transcript levels of genes related to the cell wall. Transcript levels (average FPKM) were Log10-normalized. Purple, upregulation; green, downregulation. E Callus-forming phenotypes of poplar leaves on 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 days cultured on CIM. Scale bars, 1 cm. F qRT-PCR analysis showing PagPLT1 and PagWOX5 transcript levels during tissue culture of poplar explants. G The callus-forming phenotype of wild-type and pme35 plants cultured on CIM for 10 days, with callus marked in red. Scale bars, 2 mm. H Heatmap showed the number of explants forming callus on each part of wild type and pme35 when cultured on CIM for 10 days (n = 9). I Relative ratio of callus area to the total leaf area at 10 days. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 9) (*P < 0.05, Student’s t-test). J qRT–PCR analysis of transcript levels for AtPLT1, AtPLT2, and AtWOX5 during tissue culture of wild-type and pme35 leaf explants on CIM. Data are means ± SEM from three biological replicates. Each biological replicate contained three technical replicates. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; Student’s t-test). K Cell wall-related ceRNA network in cell fate transition and proliferation phases

To better understand the mechanisms involved in callus formation, we performed functional enrichment analyses of DE mRNAs utilizing Gene Ontology (GO) databases. The enriched GO terms were associated with biosynthetic processes, catabolic processes, and defense responses (Supplementary Fig. 1C, Supplementary Table. S4). Among the various biological processes implicated by enriched GO categories, significant enrichment of cell wall biogenesis, modification, and macromolecule catabolic processes was detected during callus formation (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Table. S4). Therefore, we focused on the functions and dynamic changes of the GO categories associated with the cell wall. The expression of genes associated with cell wall degradation and loosening was predominantly upregulated during callus formation, including those coding for pectate lyase, pectin esterase/acetyl esterase, polygalacturonase, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase, and expansin (Fig. 1D, Supplementary Table S5). mRNAs related to cell wall biosynthesis, such as those encoding for cellulose synthase-like proteins, also exhibited dynamic expression patterns during callus formation (Fig. 1D, Supplementary Table S5). Based on these results, we hypothesized that cell wall degradation and biosynthesis were required for cell fate transition.

In order to further elucidate the role of cell wall integrity in callus formation, we treated 84 K poplar leaves with pectinase and cellulase. A large amount of calli was detected to form in most of the vascular bundles of explants treated with wall-degrading enzymes. However, calli were only observed at the incision and the midvein of untreated explants after culturing on CIM for 16 days (Fig. 1E). Moreover, the expression of PagPLT1 and PagWOX5, which serve as key regulators in callus formation (Zhai and Xu 2021), increased from day 8 to day 12 both in control and in enzymatically treated leaf explants (Fig. 1F). However, the tendency for changes was different from day 12 to day 16. In the control explants, the expression levels of PagPLT1 and WOX5 on day 16 were lower than those on day 12. Whereas, in explants treated with enzymes, the expression levels of PagPLT1 and WOX5 on day 16 were higher than those on day 12, an increase of 2.7-fold and 2.5-fold, respectively (Fig. 1F), suggesting that PagWOX5 and PagPLT1 were consistently upregulated in enzymatically treated explants. Furthermore, we transferred the calli derived from enzyme-treated and control poplar explants to shoot-inducing medium (SIM). After 60 days, regenerated shoots were observed from both treated and control calli (Supplementary Fig. 1D), demonstrating the pluripotency of these calli. These results suggest that damage to the cell wall positively regulates callus formation.

Then we detected the expression of genes involved in cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin and analyzed their transcript levels (Supplementary Table S6) according to previous studies (Du et al., 2020; Tang et al. 2022). Notably, the expression of PagPME35 continuously decreased during callus formation (Supplementary Table S6). In Arabidopsis, the homologous gene AtPME35 encodes a pectin methylesterase, contributing to the strengthening of cell walls (Hongo et al. 2012). Furthermore, more calli were detected on explants from Arabidopsis pme35 mutants compared to the wild-type, and the expression of PLT1, PLT2, and WOX5 was upregulated more rapidly in pme35 (Fig. 1J). Importantly, the calli derived from pme35 had the ability to regenerate shoots, similar to the calli from wild type explants (Supplementary Fig. 1E). These results suggest that cell wall properties, in turn, regulate developmental programs.

To better understand the complex regulatory network of mRNAs and ncRNAs related to the cell wall, we constructed competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks based on ceRNA theory. The ceRNA theory posits that mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs can interact with miRNAs through competitive binding to a common miRNA-binding site (Teng et al. 2023). Using target prediction and expression correction analysis, we identified 339 DE miRNA-DE mRNA, 504 DE miRNA-DE circRNA, and 173 DE miRNA-DE lncRNA interactions (Supplementary Table S7). Subsequently, ceRNA networks were constructed for two distinct phases, utilizing DE mRNAs specifically related to the cell wall (Fig. 1K). During the cell fate transition, some differentially expressed mRNAs (LOC7497843, LOC18103897 and LOC7464614) encoding enzymes, such as endoglucanase, polygalacturonase and laccase, were predicted to be regulated by lncRNAs and circRNAs through miRNAs. For instance, the mRNA (LOC7497843) encoding endoglucanase was upregulated at cell fate transition, and it was predicted to be negatively regulated by lncRNA (XLOC_001374) and circRNA (chr1:3,161,271–3,177,876:-) through the ptc-miR395 family. Since endoglucanases plays a role in cleaving internal β-glycosidic bonds in the cellulose chain (Yennamalli et al. 2013), this result suggests that the interaction of these ncRNAs with the mRNA might be involved in cellulose metabolism. In both networks, the mRNA (LOC18100262) encoding pectinesterase, which participated in the conversion of protopectin to soluble pectin and pectate (Markovic and Jornvall, 1986), was predicted to be negatively regulated by two lncRNAs (XLOC_001358 and XLOC_002045) and two circRNAs (chr2:11867870–11868802: + and chr1:34497704–34529034:-) through the ptc-miR482d-5p, forming a complex network associated with pectin degradation. Additionally, an endoglucanase mRNA (LOC18097063) was predicted to be negatively regulated by the miR169 family in both phases, suggesting that miR169s might affect cell wall metabolism during callus formation. Taken together, these results indicate that regulation of cell wall-related mRNA with tight temporal coordination of ncRNAs would be critical for highly programmed callus formation.

In conclusion, our study provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying callus formation in poplar, with important implications for the development of improved plant regeneration technology. We profiled mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA expression during callus formation in poplar and established that cell wall-related genes displayed dynamic transcriptional changes. The changes in genes related to cell wall relaxation and remodeling suggest a potential mechanism by which mature cells can be converted into pluripotent cells capable of dividing and forming callus. Moreover, modifying cell walls using enzymatic digestion of cellulose and pectin confirmed the regulatory role of the cell wall on callus formation. The callus-forming phenotypes of pme35 further highlighted the importance of investigating the role of cell wall modification, indicating that cell wall remodeling during callus formation is not only due to changes in cell mechanical properties but also actively influences callus formation. Additionally, we constructed a cell wall-related lncRNA/circRNA‒miRNA–mRNA regulatory network, which provides a valuable foundation for future studies aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying callus formation. Our findings reveal the crucial role of cell wall remodeling in promoting callus formation, laying the groundwork for innovative strategies in callus-based organ regeneration. This has significant implications for the development of plant regeneration technology, particularly for rare or economically valuable tree species.

Availability of data and materials

The original data used to support the findings can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author. All data supporting this research result can be obtained in the paper and within its Supplementary Materials published online.

Abbreviations

ceRNA:

competing endogenous RNA

circRNA:

circular RNA

DE:

differentially expressed

lncRNA:

long non-coding RNAs

ncRNA:

non-coding RNAs

PLT:

PLETHORA

WOX:

WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly thank editors and reviewers for valuable critics and revisions on the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by funding from the Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program (Grant No.2022xjkk1200), the National Key R&D Program of China during the 14th Five-year Plan Period (2023YFD2200101), National Natural Science Foundation of China (91954202, 32000483, 32001293, and 32370740), Beijing Forestry University Outstanding Young Talent Cultivation Project (2019JQ03003), the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 project, B13007), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (QNTD202305).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xiaojuan Li and Yaning Cui designed the experiments and supervised the study; Xiaomin Yao and Xinwei Wang collected the materials; Yaning Cui and Geng Zhang performed the transcriptional profiling; Geng Zhang and Peipei Liu analyzed the data and performed the experiment; Yaning Cui and Guifang Zhang provided suggestions on experiments; Geng Zhang and Xiaojuan Li wrote the manuscript; Peipei Liu, Yueqian Zhang and Jinxing Lin revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yaning Cui or Xiaojuan Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Prof. Jinxing Lin is a member of the Editorial Board for Molecular Horticulture. He was not involved in the journal’s review of, and decisions related to, this manuscript. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Materials and Methods.

Additional file 2:

Supplementary Figure S1.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table S1.

All RNAs from S1, S2 and S3 of 84 K poplar. Supplementary Table S2. All differential expression RNAs from S1, S2 and S3 of 84 K poplar. Supplementary Table S3. Transcription profiles of the genes related to callus formation. Supplementary Table S4. GO term enrichment of differentially expressed mRNAs. Supplementary Table S5. Differential expression genes associated with cell wall. Supplementary Table S6. Transcription profiles of the poplar genes orthologous to Arabidopsis genes involved in cell wall. Supplementary Table S7. Pairwise expression correlations of all miRNAs and target RNAs.

Additional file 4:

Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Liu, P., Zhang, G. et al. Cell wall remodeling promotes callus formation in poplar. Mol Horticulture 4, 16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43897-024-00093-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43897-024-00093-4